« Review : Mozilla Thunderbird Email Client | Main | Statement from Gollum on The Oscar Nominations »

If I Ran The World The Oscars Would Be Much Much Cooler.

Oscar StatueToday The tools of the MPAA monopolists will announce the nominees for this year's film popularity contest called The 76th Oscars. Now I have said it before and I will say it again. The Oscars are not a showing of skill and excellence but of popularity and marketing. The valedictorian is the best student but they are rarely Prom Queen or King. So if It were a perfect world the following flicks would win.

Best Picture
The Lord of the Rings Return of the King. I don't really have to explain it. I mean if Shakespeare in Love, Braveheart, Gladiator, and Titanic can win then I can't find one logical explanation as to why the Hollywood establishment should shaft Peter Jackson's once in a life-time epic. Just remember than Annie Hall beat Star Wars for the Best Picture of 1977. Sad really.

Best Leading Actor
Bruce Campbell in Bubba Hotep. It was the role of a lifetime and there was no one on the face of the earth who could have pulled it off with the same convincing attitude and humanity. Not to mention that Bruce has experience fighting the undead.

Best Supporting Actor
Andy Serkis in The Lord of the Rings Return of the King. Gollum was incredible and I can't think of a more emotionally twitching performance over the trilogy. The work and effort that he poured into the character will be admired for decades to come. Screw the technology it was the soul and effort that made the character so real and human.

Best Leading Actress
Uma Thurman in Kill Bill. I know it will never happen in a million years because this kind of smart low-brow stereotypical exploitation flicks will never win.. except perhaps Boogie Nights.

Best Supporting Actress
Sean Astin in The Lord of the Rings : Return of the King for his portrayal as Sam. I can't think of a better person to deserve this when I think of all they crying, blubbering, emotional outbursts, co-dependence, care giving , cooking and vague homoerotic subtext in his craft.

And then The Lord of the Rings Return of the King wins everything else.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Icon of JakeJake at January 27, 2004  Rants

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.8bitjoystick.com/cgi-bin/mtype/mt-tb.cgi/512

Comments

Do you know if the emachines M5310 laptop will run higher screen resolutions than 1024x768 if you connect an external monitor and what refresh rate is max at higher resolutions like 1280x1024? I have a 21" monitor that I like to run at 1280x1024 and 72 or 75 Hz.

Thanks

Mike

Posted by: Mike at January 27, 2004 2:46 AM

I think Sean Astin might disagree with that Actress award for him. ;)

Posted by: jason at January 27, 2004 7:05 AM

First of all I was talking about Oscar predictions and if you have some feel free to share.

The native resoluton of the M5310 laptop screen is 1280X800 thats is more a wide screen display.

You can use an external Monitor but you are the mercy of the shared DDR memory in the graphics chip. It can do thats resoluton and 2d-graphics would work fine but I would not want to play Quake 3 at thats resoluton on thats chip.

Posted by: Jake at January 27, 2004 9:20 AM

After thinking about your question last night "Who deserves the best actress award" I have to disagree about picture and actress.

I think for actress Charlotte Rampling for the movie Swimming Pool. She gave an incredible performance of a woman facing the December of her life, fighting against society insisting that woman not still be sexual or mysterious creatures. But predictable, boring and consistent. Her performance is excellent and will probably be completely ignored. This is a female dominated movie, (and no it isn't a chick flick) that shows the complexity and beauty of the female spirit. Without needing a bunch of special effects.

Also who deserves best Actress is Maggie Gyllenhaal the older sisiter in Donnie Darko. Her uncanny and stunning portrayal of a woman who needs/wants to be controlled and her complete submission/need to her Love and master are beautifully orchestrated. Yes this is a movie about Dominance and submission, but unlike most movies with this subject matter it is not pornographic in its portrayal. I think it is one of the few honest movies to deal with this subject. Not every person who enjoys/needs or wants submission or dominance is a leather whipping sex freak. Trust me I know they are out there, but I believe this movie captures the true spirit of submission/dominance for those of us who actually want trust, manogamy, healing and control. This movie takes all the "show/stage" aspect out of it, and shows the deep underlying need for someone who craves to be dominated and or submissive in its most basic sense.

I have decided not to include what I feel should be best movie for fear of hurting your feelings and I don't want to take away from the magic of the Lord of the Ring trilogy.

But I will say this: Director Steven Shainberg performs a remarkable feat by taking what could be construed as weighty material and infusing it with sensuality and, even more surprisingly, "humor." The exquisitely honed character development of Secretary lures us to the darker side of human sexuality, all the while soothing us with the idea that people are getting--and giving--what they want. Much credit is due to actors Gyllenhaal and Spader, who are perversely delightful to watch as they maneuver through their teeter-totter relationship with skill and precision. While it toys with society's expectations of love, Secretary also explores the delicate balance between pain and healing, control and surrender. It could never be labeled old-fashioned but, when all is said and done, Secretary is, at its core, a love story.

Posted by: Kymberly at January 27, 2004 5:19 PM

Bruce Fucking Campbell?? What makes it worse is that I know you're serious!

Posted by: Anna at January 28, 2004 4:17 PM

Bruce Fucking Campbell?? What makes it worse is that I know you're serious!

Posted by: Anna at January 28, 2004 4:18 PM

Well Anna. Did you actually see Bubba Hotep? It was better than anything else up there on the Oscars list.

Posted by: Jake at January 28, 2004 4:20 PM

If it were a popularity contest, then they wouldn't nominate the art hosue films they do, they'd nominate the Matrix films.

Second, the academy only has as much power as we give it. It's not the award for the best film of the year, it's the award for what the academy thought was the best film of the year. If no one gave a shit what they thought, their power would be lost.

Posted by: Ken at January 28, 2004 5:01 PM

Yeah but the "Art House Films" that they do nominate are financed by Disney or some other large media company. I think Whale Rider is the only film up there that you could really call Indy.

Posted by: Jake at January 28, 2004 5:08 PM

Oh man! I cannot think of a worse waste of time than watching whale rider. I would rather die or be destroyed by intergalactic prostitute packing a "shatner-scope".

Posted by: pete at January 28, 2004 6:54 PM

I can think of a logical reason Rings won't win: The Academy are idiots who let their secretaries vote for them and get caught trying to sell advance screener DVDs on eBay.

Also, hobbits who cry because someone dropped a hat again.

But look on the bright side. At least the obvious Oscarbait, like Cold Mountain and Dances With Samurai, got shut out of Best Picture. So there's hope.

Posted by: Evilninja at January 30, 2004 11:52 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?